USA

Lord Rothschild: Trump threatens to destroy the New World Order

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

Lord Rothschild warned that President Donald Trump threatens to destroy the New World Order and “must be stopped at all costs”

The Economist, owned by the Rothschild family, has labeled Trump as a “present danger” for the “New World Order” and admitted that the globalist elitists who created it “spin in their graves.”

“Perhaps the greatest danger at this point is the duty of the US president who despises international standards, which undermines free trade and who steadily flinches away from the essential role of America in maintaining the global legal order,” says The Economist.

Despite the list of legitimate threats such as jihadism and terrorism, communist Chinese expansion and hostility to North Korea, the article published in the journal Economist proclaimed Trump the greatest threat to the “liberal” New World Order.

“Perhaps the greatest danger at this point is the duty of the US president who despises international standards, which undermines free trade and who steadily flinches away from the essential role of America in maintaining the global legal order,” says The Economist.

The globalist media is referring to a book called “Internacionalists” to explain the origin of the “liberal international order” as a move to “declare an aggressive war to be illegal”, which is why it must “defend itself as never before”.

“The international order based on the rules of the international order that emerged from the ruins of the Second World War was a huge improvement over any previous period,” the article states.

“However, liberal internationalism is now under attack from many sides. The American first doctrine of Donald Trump explicitly rejects it. “

The Economist describes how Trump’s administration looks at the world stage, citing a piece written by two Trump advisors in the Wall Street Journal magazine.

“The world is not a ‘global community,’ but an arena involving nationals, non-governmental actors and companies that are competing for the benefit,” wrote H.R. McMaster and Gary Cohn. “We only bring military, political, economic, cultural and moral forces to this forum. Instead of neglecting this elementary nature of international affairs, we will accept it. “

The Economist then published an unusual statement that, despite America being directly responsible for numerous wars and destabilizing attempts at state-wide strikes worldwide, the New World Order is “better than any alternative.”

“Of course, there are still many wars,” he says. “In a way, the New World Order, which has helped make so much less stressful international wars, inadvertently enabled more ‘inter-national’ wars.

“Unstable and stupid countries that have been afraid of being captured by more powerful neighboring countries can now become victims of civil wars or harsh rebellion without bad actors fearing they will lose the national territory they are trying to control. Non-governmental groups, such as the Islamic State, may take some time and hold it for a while. A well-meaning but badly-conceived war that wants to change disgusting regimes sometimes can go the wrong side. “

Magazine concludes the article by claiming that NWO architects from the past “turn in their graves” given Trump’s already gone and that he must be removed from the office to preserve the New World Order.

 

Share.

About Author

Comments are closed.